Featured

Build a system for documentation

We all know planning cycle:

https://wehearyou.acecqa.gov.au/2016/09/01/unpacking-the-planning-cycle-part-1/

Observations

Writing snapshots every two weeks is the first step of planning cycles. With that I have a snapshots planning sheet to follow with, which is a table shows each child’s name in my group, with corresponding IDP, family members, and each week with start and end dates to make sure none of them missing a snapshot.

A more detailed of how a snapshot or learning story should looked like, here are some examples worth to be looked at:

https://getearlyworks.com.au/learning-story-observations/

Learning stories were introduced by Margaret Carr in 2001 in her book “Assessment in Early Childhood Settings: Learning Stories” and further expanded upon in “Learning Stories: Constructing Learner Identities in Early Education” by Margaret Carr and Wendy Lee.

https://aussiechildcarenetwork.com.au/articles/childcare-programming/observations-in-childcare

Planning

Programming and planning for early years children should be emergent, which means, responsive and relevant. https://wehearyou.acecqa.gov.au/2016/09/07/emergent-curriculum-doesnt-mean-no-need-to-plan/

Interactionist Theory

“Frameworks for Learning and Development 3e”

This theory of language development sees language acquisition as both social and biological in nature. Children are born with the predisposition to communicate and language is acquired within a social context with adults who scaffold children’s language learning. Theorists who support this model of ;anguage acquisition include Jerome Bruner and Lev Vygotsky.

Cognitivist Theory

In this theory, Language is acquired through the process of thinking.

“Frameworks for Learning and Development 3e”

Jean Piaget (1952) theorised that cognitive development proceeds as a result of a child’s interaction with the environment and that language depends on cognition. Piaget believed that language may facilitate learning but did not bring about cognitive growth. (Personally disgree.For example, Language skills leads to reading and reading leads to cognitive development.) Piaget implied that the ability to communicate adequately is connected to cognitive development, but more often language reflects rather than determines cognitive development.

Piaget believed children passed through predictable, sequential stages of cognitive development. In the first stage, sensorimotor, the infant learns about their environment by exploring through their senses. Towards the end of sensorimotor stage the child begins to understand the existence of symbols for real objects. Initially these symbolic representations are spoken words that represent people or objects, such as “mummy”,”daddy” or “ball”.

During the next stage of development, the preoperational stage, the child develops an understanding that written words can represent people, objects, actions and feelings; tell a story; or give information.

At the concrete operational stage the childuses logic and predictions to solve problems such as mathematical concepts. By the time the child reaches the formal operational stage, symbols are used in complex ways to think abstractly about ideas and issues.

Piaget divided children’s language into egocentric speech and socialised speech.

Egocentric speech describes the child’s first attempts at language, such as babbling and cooing. As words develop, the child’s language centres on the self — talking to themselves, talking about themselves and talking for themselves. Egocentric speech continues into early childhood, and is present even when the child is interacting with other children.

Piaget observed that, by age 7, egocentric speech begins to be replaced with sociallised speech as children become less egocentric and are more able to actively listen and respond to a shared topic of conversation. ” (From my own experience, I have seen some 3 yrs old and many 4-5 yrs old using socialised speech in kinder though)

Behaviourist theory

In this theory, Language is acquired by operant conditioning — imitation and reinforcement.

“Frameworks for Learning and Development 3e”

B.F. Skinner‘s (1957) behaviourist theory of language development explains language acquisition as a ‘stimulus-response’ process. Behaviourists believe language is learned through imitation and practice.

Associating sounds with objects, actions and events, infants learn to speak and listen by turn taking with adult. A process of modelling and reinforecement is used as the child imitates and practises language. In this theory, the child is seen as ‘an empty vessel’ waiting to be filled with knowledge and information. According to behaviourist theory, children learn language by imitating an adultmodel and having their attempts either positively or negatively reinforced.

Behaviourist theory does not adequately explain the rapid development of language which cannot be learned solely by imitation, nor does it explain why children make mistakes when generalising rules such as pasttense; for example, ‘I wented to the beach’ or ‘I goed shopping yesterday.’ “

Nativist Theory

In this theory, Language is natually acquired through the presence of a language acquisition device (LAD) that is present from birth.

“Framework for Learning and Development 3e”:

Noam Chomsky’s(1976) nativist theory of language development suggests children are equipped with language skills at birth which are activated as the child matures. Chomsky described language as “unfolding” as the child matures. He believed there were ‘universal principles’ built into the brain, and that the child was preprogrammed to learn language. He used the term language acquisition device (LAD) to describe this special biological brain mechanism. The LAD is activited when infants begin to be exposed to language.”

“Most recently, critics of Chomsky suggest that, rather than being born with the innate ability to use language, children are born with the ability to interpret language using structure analysis. Yang and Lust (2009) refer to this as the child’s ability to ‘crack the codes’of their language, which is a universal skill. Yang and lust believe that children can work out their language system — word meaning, setence structure and sounds — with accurary.”

Applications:

  • If the environment that a child grows up with has very little use of language, it is hindering the child’s language development.
  • Before talking, if the child has been exposed to language and still doesn’t respond when adults are trying to communicate with the child, for example, making funny sounds and faces but the child has no facial expression (specific months to be confirmed), or calling the child’s name but no responding (at the age of 8 month?)
  • the development of acquiring a high level of language skill always start from being able to understand and interpret first. For example, a child that can use single words, understand a simple sentence beofre being able to say it; likewise, a child that can say a simple sentence, understand two steps instructions beofre being able to say a complex sentence. If a child doesn’t listen when complex instructions are given, may be it is because the lack of language development and communication skill. (especially for 3-5 years, NOT ALL the preschoolers are able to comprehence complex instructions which soemtimes mistaken as misbehaviour.)
Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started